Nabil Luqman

0f9d2dd4f71434084e2b6094de1865e23abb37bb9f28ca51feeabee679ec9be2

Money

viral

restaurant

issue

Singapore

controversy

prank

chinatown

Tariff

American Tax

Xie Lao Song

A restaurant in the heart of Singapore&rsquo;s Chinatown has denied any involvement in a viral notice that claimed American diners would be charged a 104 per cent surcharge, dismissing it as a &ldquo;malicious prank&rdquo;. The handwritten sign, which was displayed in both English and Chinese and bore the name of Xie Lao Song, appeared at the restaurant&rsquo;s entrance and quickly attracted widespread attention online.
The sign claimed the surcharge would take effect from 9 April 2025, just one day after US President Donald Trump announced a staggering 104 per cent tariff on Chinese goods. The uncanny timing and the mirroring of the tariff amount led many to speculate that the restaurant was making a political statement, retaliating in jest against the newly imposed American policy.
Videos of the notice were shared on platforms such as TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram, racking up hundreds of thousands of views and thousands of comments. Some internet users praised what they perceived as a show of solidarity with China, hailing the restaurant for taking a bold stance. Others, however, were quick to criticise the move as xenophobic and discriminatory, warning that such tactics were inappropriate and potentially damaging to Singapore&rsquo;s image as an inclusive and multicultural society.
<blockquote class="tiktok-embed" style="max-width: 605px; min-width: 325px;" cite="https://www.tiktok.com/@sgwhatsup/video/7491591999599201543" data-video-id="7491591999599201543">
<section><a title="@sgwhatsup" href="https://www.tiktok.com/@sgwhatsup?refer=embed" target="_blank" rel="noopener">@sgwhatsup</a>
Chinese Restauant Xie Lao Song in Singapore imposes 104% surcharge on Americans in response to Trump tariff on China
<a title="♬ News, news, seriousness, tension(1077866) - Lyrebirds music" href="https://www.tiktok.com/music/News-news-seriousness-tension-1077866-6997840505614632962?refer=embed" target="_blank" rel="noopener">♬ News, news, seriousness, tension(1077866) - Lyrebirds music</a></section>
</blockquote>

<script async="" src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script>

Restaurant Responds: &lsquo;We Would Never Do Something So Crass&rsquo;
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/848d9dc3cf9de402de9a24733d234dbb58a0e2d94bd8f715ecd5630f08d6b242" />
In response to the viral attention, a staff member at Xie Lao Song firmly refuted the idea that the restaurant had anything to do with the signage. Speaking to The Straits Times in Mandarin, she called the incident a &ldquo;malicious prank&rdquo; and insisted that no employee or manager had authorised or posted the notice.
&ldquo;We&rsquo;ve been open for over a decade. We would never do something so crass,&rdquo; she said, clearly dismayed by the negative attention the prank had brought to the restaurant.
The staff member added that the business was investigating the incident internally and had not ruled out lodging a police report, although she declined to offer additional details pending further inquiry. When asked about the whereabouts of the restaurant&rsquo;s owner, she claimed he was currently travelling for work and unavailable for comment.
By the time The Straits Times visited the premises before noon on 11 April, both versions of the notice had been removed from the entrance. Employees of neighbouring Chinese eateries told reporters they had not seen or heard anything about the signs and reported no similar experiences.
Was It a Political Statement or Just a Hoax?
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/66e494d39103a0ebab60f5d8829610a431ea58e576c5a636afe6120c2978f049" />
The handwritten notices, signed off as &ldquo;Xie Lao Song, Singapore&rdquo;, bore the distinct appearance of an attempt at satire or political parody. The fact that the prank surfaced just after Trump&rsquo;s tariff announcement has led to widespread speculation about the motive behind it.
While some netizens viewed it as a clever, albeit cheeky, act of protest, others questioned whether the sign was actually intended to provoke outrage or simply generate publicity. A few commenters even suggested it could have been an attempt at guerrilla marketing, though the restaurant&rsquo;s firm denial seems to counter that theory.
Regardless of the original intention, the incident has sparked renewed conversations about how global politics can spill over into the private sector, even in seemingly unrelated contexts like restaurant dining.
Here&rsquo;s some of the comments from netizens online:
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/6be07b08c3190e3058c5e792f0e02ca88c4bcd6d14f7b936627ef4d6524c0fcd" />
Consumer Watchdog and Authorities React
The Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS) issued a statement in response to media queries, confirming that they were aware of the incident and acknowledged that the offending notice had been removed.
&ldquo;In general, CCCS does not intervene in prices that private businesses choose to charge their customers, insofar as the prices are independently determined and clearly communicated to customers before purchase,&rdquo; a spokesperson said.
The clarification reinforces that while businesses in Singapore are free to set their own pricing strategies, any such pricing must be fair, transparent, and free from discriminatory practices.
Tensions Escalate: Tariffs on Both Sides Climb
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/9dd048ab0f3a87a3dc254931206310a3eb3f7a835bfe2195d389e6dc171a69ca" />
This local incident unfolded against the backdrop of an escalating US-China trade war. President Trump&rsquo;s 104 per cent tariff, announced on 8 April, is part of a broader campaign to impose stricter trade conditions on Chinese imports. The move raised the total US tariff rate on Chinese goods to 145 per cent, after an earlier 20 per cent duty was introduced earlier this year and further 125 per cent tariffs were added in April.
In retaliation, Beijing imposed its own tariffs, increasing duties on American imports to 125 per cent on 11 April. Although Trump announced a 90-day pause on new tariffs for most countries, China was explicitly excluded from the reprieve following its retaliatory measures.
The heightened trade tensions have had ripple effects not just across global markets but, evidently, in public discourse and private businesses as well&mdash;even those that have no direct involvement in international politics.
The viral prank at Xie Lao Song may have started as a joke&mdash;or an act of provocation&mdash;but it has offered a striking example of how geopolitical flashpoints can find their way into the most unexpected corners of daily life. Whether the culprits behind the signage will be identified remains to be seen, but for now, the restaurant is left managing the fallout from a controversy it claims it never intended.
What are your thoughts on this? Let us know in the comments. 
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

When a controversial surcharge notice goes viral.

7926197a78f00871fc9d95101d0690d0e8b20b60eb632d8f8fbfd34c98ca42e4

Singapore Chinatown Restaurant Denies Viral 104% 'American Tax' Sign As Malicious Prank

d9d56c8e5c29847e2917983575418651c94c72608ef9e914a6542c4a698d7349

Scentify

e891e864574960ae21e3a00f338f06377dd53af0baffdac1786ad4ed7dad7721

Oatside

c6e5412e94f35f5e45d8d645b31f06c7e7692356c43e40dffb5b8af1b8e8c3a9

Rohto

4a748b89ff3ed827c2f616757f44645a494284ce781ca71dce7bf93343f62cd4

Starting 1 July 2025, electricity consumers in Peninsular Malaysia will experience a major transformation in how their electricity usage is billed. Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB), guided by the Energy Commission (Suruhanjaya Tenaga or ST), is rolling out a restructured electricity tariff framework that prioritises transparency, fairness, and closer reflection of actual market dynamics.
&nbsp;
A New Era of Clarity and Efficiency
&nbsp;
Under Regulatory Period 4 (RP4) of the Incentive-Based Regulation (IBR), the revamped tariff structure reflects the true cost of delivering electricity&mdash;from generation to distribution&mdash;while promoting responsible energy usage. This shift impacts more than 23.6 million domestic electricity users in Peninsular Malaysia.
Rather than relying on traditional tiered or block-based pricing, the new structure breaks down your bill into five main components:
<ul>
<li>Energy Charge: Cost of generating electricity.</li>
<li>Automatic Fuel Adjustment (AFA): Adjusted monthly based on global fuel prices and foreign exchange fluctuations.</li>
<li>Capacity Charge: Costs related to standby power generation.</li>
<li>Network Charge: Infrastructure, transmission, and distribution costs.</li>
<li>Retail Charge: Administrative cost of RM10/month (waived for usage below 600kWh).</li>
</ul>
&nbsp;
Tariff Categories Simplified
Previously, users were classified by customer activity type (commercial, industrial, etc.). Now, the categories are streamlined based on connection voltage level:
<ul>
<li>Domestic (households)</li>
<li>Non-Domestic:</li>
<ul>
<li>Low Voltage</li>
<li>Medium Voltage</li>
<li>High Voltage</li>
</ul>
</ul>
This simplification is intended to improve user understanding of tariffs and ensure consistency in pricing.
&nbsp;
Time of Use (ToU): Now Open to Households
&nbsp;
A major highlight of this restructuring is the introduction of the Time of Use (ToU) pricing scheme to domestic users for the first time. Previously limited to commercial and industrial sectors, ToU now allows households and small businesses with Smart Meters to enjoy dynamic pricing based on when they consume electricity.
ToU Time Bands:
<ul>
<li>Weekdays (Monday&ndash;Friday):</li>
<ul>
<li>Peak Hours: 2:00 PM &ndash; 10:00 PM</li>
<li>Off-Peak Hours: 10:00 PM &ndash; 2:00 PM (next day)</li>
</ul>
<li>Weekends (Saturday &amp; Sunday):</li>
<ul>
<li>Off-Peak All Day</li>
</ul>
</ul>
ToU Rates:
<ul>
<li>Usage &le; 1,500 kWh/month:</li>
<ul>
<li>Peak: 28.52 sen/kWh</li>
<li>Off-peak: 24.43 sen/kWh</li>
</ul>
<li>Usage &gt; 1,500 kWh/month:</li>
<ul>
<li>Peak: 38.52 sen/kWh</li>
<li>Off-peak: 34.43 sen/kWh</li>
</ul>
</ul>
Compared to the standard flat rates (27.03 sen/kWh and 37.03 sen/kWh respectively), ToU off-peak usage offers savings of 2.6 sen/kWh.
&nbsp;
Who Can Opt In and How?
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
The ToU scheme is optional and available only to users with:
<ul>
<li>A Smart Meter</li>
<li>A Current Transformer (CT) Meter, or</li>
<li>A Remote Meter Reading (RMR) Meter</li>
</ul>
To apply, visit your nearest Kedai Tenaga or check your eligibility via the myTNB app. The switch is not automatic and must be requested manually.
&nbsp;
Understanding the New Bill Layout
Your monthly electricity bill will now be more detailed and transparent, showing:
<ul>
<li>Energy charge per kWh</li>
<li>Monthly AFA adjustment (rebate or surcharge)</li>
<li>Capacity and network charges</li>
<li>RM10 retail charge (waived under 600kWh)</li>
<li>Incentives for efficient energy use</li>
<li>Any applicable taxes and government rebates</li>
</ul>
For example, a household using 800kWh/month would pay an estimated average of 44.5 sen/kWh under the new structure, excluding taxes and AFA&mdash;a marginal improvement from the old tiered system.
&nbsp;
Tools and Strategies for Cost Savings
TNB is also launching an updated bill calculator (available from 23 June 2025) to help users estimate their bills under the new rates. In the meantime, here are some tips:
<ul>
<li>Shift high-energy activities like laundry, water heating, and EV charging to off-peak hours</li>
<li>Monitor usage via the myTNB app</li>
<li>Keep monthly usage below 600kWh to waive the RM10 charge</li>
<li>Consider investing in a solar PV system for long-term cost reduction</li>
</ul>
&nbsp;
Rebates and Protection for Vulnerable Groups
To ensure inclusivity, rebates and discounts remain in place for targeted communities:
<ul>
<li>RM40/month rebate for hardcore poor (under e-Kasih)</li>
<li>10% discount for:</li>
<ul>
<li>Places of worship</li>
<li>Registered welfare organisations (e.g. orphanages, homes for the elderly or disabled)</li>
<li>Government or partially government-funded institutions</li>
</ul>
</ul>
So, Will Your Electricity Bill Rise or Fall?
According to TNB, most households&mdash;particularly those consuming 900kWh/month or less&mdash;are not expected to see significant increases. In fact, many could benefit from small reductions. However, the final cost may vary based on the AFA adjustment, which is tied to global fuel market trends.
Ultimately, this new tariff structure aims to empower consumers to take control of their electricity use. With greater clarity, flexibility, and tools like ToU pricing and smart metering, Malaysians are better positioned to manage their bills and support national energy efficiency goals.
For more information or to use the bill calculator, visit: <a href="http://www.mytnb.com.my/tariff">www.mytnb.com.my/tariff</a>&nbsp;
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

With new rates kicking in from July 2025, Malaysians might finally see some savings on their electricity bills.

a001d506f1802743a6d9a0a93401e558544b3c0f1763b3747cbbd9c335e0628e

Malaysia’s Electricity Tariff Restructuring 2025: What You Need To Know

Apple is facing a proposed class action lawsuit in the United States after a woman claimed she lost US$80,000 (~RM340,000) through a cryptocurrency scam app downloaded directly from the official Apple App Store.
The lawsuit was filed in California by Danyell Shin, who alleges that the app in question&mdash;Swiftcrypt&mdash;was part of a sophisticated fraud scheme commonly referred to as "pig butchering". The method involves gradually gaining a victim&rsquo;s trust before coaxing them into investing larger sums of money. Once enough funds are deposited, the perpetrators vanish&mdash;locking users out of their accounts and disappearing with the cash.
The Swiftcrypt Scam: Trust Betrayed
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/8345d3639b4aec5d8866154452c2bcf5c7358407b2fc7b23e36a41ceaaa6a454" />
Shin reportedly discovered Swiftcrypt in late 2023 or early 2024 through an online investment group. Convinced of its legitimacy&mdash;partly due to its availability on Apple&rsquo;s App Store&mdash;she downloaded the app and began investing, believing she was seeing returns. After following instructions provided within the app, she made successive deposits totalling $80,000. Then, suddenly, her access was revoked and the funds were gone.
In her lawsuit, Shin claims she reasonably relied on Apple&rsquo;s widely publicised assurances that all App Store apps undergo rigorous security screening. By hosting Swiftcrypt, she argues, Apple misled users into believing the app was trustworthy and safe to use.
Apple&rsquo;s &lsquo;Walled Garden&rsquo; Under Scrutiny
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/eb474ae66c57d2e6677a9126d8c7f16e579048cb2d1be48bf6711329c6bbfddc" />
For years, Apple has defended its exclusive App Store ecosystem as a secure and carefully curated platform. From the late Steve Jobs to current executives like Craig Federighi, the tech giant has consistently portrayed the App Store as a bulwark against cybercriminals. Apple often highlights its app review process and routinely markets the App Store as &ldquo;safe&rdquo; and &ldquo;trusted.&rdquo;
Shin&rsquo;s lawsuit challenges those claims. It accuses Apple of misrepresentation and failing in its duty to protect users by allowing a scam app to slip through its vetting process. It also points to the company&rsquo;s monopoly over app distribution on iOS devices as a contributing factor in fostering false confidence among consumers.
&ldquo;Apple has structured its ecosystem so that customers rely on Apple for the perceived safety and reliability of the App Store,&rdquo; the lawsuit argues.
Legal Claims and Broader Implications
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/53f54c80ef9f82e11c3207583554d343e13fbad6dbb2a53873e709dc589e8e86" />
The legal action seeks damages for violations of California&rsquo;s consumer protection and competition laws. It also alleges that Shin &ldquo;overpaid&rdquo; for her iPhone, under the premise that part of the phone&rsquo;s value lies in its supposedly secure App Store.
Beyond individual compensation, the suit calls for corrective advertising to clarify the real security limitations of Apple&rsquo;s platform.
The case has yet to be certified as a class action, which would require the court to determine if there are enough similarly affected individuals to proceed collectively. So far, no other victims from Shin&rsquo;s investment group have publicly joined the case.
A Pattern of Legal Firestorms
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/3040a6e38954e82fd1f55bc3cdd5b4cd22a18eadf7b25a6f33eb9397b1ce4fa7" />
This isn&rsquo;t the first time Apple&rsquo;s App Store practices have faced legal challenges. Most notably, the Epic Games v Apple case accused the company of anti-competitive behaviour by mandating the use of its own in-app purchase system, from which Apple takes a 30% commission. Apple largely emerged unscathed from that lawsuit, but it sparked widespread debate about digital marketplaces and monopolistic control.
In the UK, Apple is also facing a separate &pound;1.5 billion (approximately US$2 billion) anti-trust class action trial over similar allegations relating to its App Store policies.
Victim Blaming or Corporate Responsibility?
Some commentators have suggested that Shin shares some responsibility for her losses, noting that Swiftcrypt lacked substantial online presence or regulatory credentials. Critics argue that a basic search might have raised red flags&mdash;highlighting the barebones website and absence of legitimate reviews. Others point to the broader difficulty consumers face in distinguishing genuine apps from scams, especially within a platform marketed as safe by design.
Even so, many agree that the issue highlights the growing sophistication of fraud and the limits of current app review systems&mdash;even those managed by tech titans like Apple.
Apple Yet to Respond
As of now, Apple has not issued any formal response to the lawsuit. The Swiftcrypt app has since been removed from the App Store, and its official website has been taken down. There is no indication whether the company will attempt to settle or fight the lawsuit in court.
Meanwhile, the case underscores growing global scrutiny of major tech companies and the platforms they control. With third-party app stores now emerging in the EU under new regulations such as the Digital Markets Act (DMA), Apple&rsquo;s future grip on app distribution may weaken&mdash;but with it, possibly the consistency of app safety as well.
What are your thoughts on this? Let us know in the comments. 
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

Swiftcrypt scam sparks lawsuit — is the App Store as safe as Apple claims?

77a7d90a23b32e6167d11a9a4c60444bf74ba7c7d92c76af9a5de9d81caed35b

Apple Sued Over Crypto Scam: Woman Loses $80,000 After Downloading Fraudulent App From App Store

A Malaysian company has come under intense public scrutiny after a team-building ice bath challenge left one of its female employees collapsed and unable to stand unaided. What began as a corporate wellness activity quickly turned into a viral controversy&mdash;raising questions about safety protocols, employer responsibility, and the rise of extreme self-improvement culture in the workplace.
From Motivation to Medical Emergency
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/37f623645efafc6a70c81dbd3d462c6368d0cd8d2736922d53af4bc3483b80ab" />
In a video that has since made rounds on TikTok, Instagram and Facebook, a young woman is seen participating in a team-building challenge where employees were required to remain submerged in an ice bath for a full 10 minutes. As the footage progresses, it&rsquo;s evident she is in growing physical distress&mdash;her lips turn purple, her face pales, and her body begins to tremble violently.
Despite her deteriorating condition, she pushes through while chanting motivational affirmations like:
&ldquo;I must be myself. I need to break through. I&rsquo;m not afraid of pain or hardship. I&rsquo;m not afraid to cross this road.&rdquo;
<iframe style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Freel%2F1846072592625046&amp;width=500&amp;show_text=true&amp;height=697&amp;appId" width="500" height="697" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
Moments after the challenge ends, the woman appears disoriented and unable to stand. Her colleagues rush in, lifting her out of the ice-filled tub and attempting to massage her legs, which are visibly reddened from the prolonged cold exposure. She can be seen slipping into a limp state, sparking real concerns about her physical wellbeing.
Company&rsquo;s Defence: &ldquo;We&rsquo;re Not a Cult&rdquo;
The video sparked immediate online outrage, with many questioning the ethics and legality of such an exercise being carried out in a workplace setting. Critics described the act as dangerous, unnecessary, and even exploitative, with some likening it to cult-like conditioning rather than professional development.
<blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DLC21sPP-ru/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14">
<div style="padding: 16px;">
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;">&nbsp;</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 19% 0;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="padding-top: 8px;">
<div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 12.5% 0;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;">
<div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);">&nbsp;</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: 8px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);">&nbsp;</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: auto;">
<div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);">&nbsp;</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;">&nbsp;</div>
</div>
<p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DLC21sPP-ru/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by вєℓ&iota;&eta;&part;&alpha; в&sigma;&eta;g &rho;є&iota; &fnof;є&eta;g ｜BB &amp; VV创办人 (@belindabongg)</a>
</div>
</blockquote>

<script async="" src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>

In response, the company&rsquo;s founder took to Facebook with a strongly-worded post defending the ice bath challenge and dismissing the criticism. She claimed that the event had been conducted under professional medical supervision and insisted that employees were not coerced.
&ldquo;Why do we get criticised? Is it because we&rsquo;re merely a small and medium enterprise (SME)? We&rsquo;re not a cult. We&rsquo;re just a group of women working hard for our dreams,&rdquo; she wrote.
The founder added that the challenge was inspired by similar routines performed by celebrities and influencers, including athletes and politicians, and that it was meant to build resilience, mental strength, and team spirit.
&ldquo;You can laugh at us and criticise all you want, but we will keep working hard for our dreams.&rdquo;
The Ice Bath Trend: More Than Just a Fad
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/459625245446569657581d1aeb6a1932f79e2ee5b5c9ba37de6cf09055787efb" />
The ice bath trend has surged in popularity over the last decade, bolstered initially by the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge in 2014&mdash;a viral campaign aimed at raising awareness and funds for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Since then, ice-related stunts have evolved into more extreme forms, particularly in the health and wellness space.
One of the most influential proponents is Dutch endurance athlete Wim Hof, famously known as &ldquo;The Iceman.&rdquo; Hof&rsquo;s breathing and cold therapy techniques claim to offer a range of benefits including improved immunity, reduced stress, enhanced circulation, and mental clarity.
Athletes use ice baths to aid muscle recovery, and social media has only amplified the visibility of the practice. Malaysian politician Khairy Jamaluddin has shared his own experience with cold exposure therapy. In the US, even former President Donald Trump has been photographed engaging in ice bath routines.
But what works for professional athletes or public figures under expert supervision may not be suitable for the average employee&mdash;especially in corporate settings where implied pressure and hierarchy can complicate consent.
Health Risks: What the Experts Say
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/36e740e09719142fcb4f50932d180e086cbf80cabec0b04a942fe486b9a94741" />
Medical professionals have repeatedly warned about the dangers of prolonged cold water immersion, particularly for individuals with no prior exposure or training.
Cold exposure for more than a few minutes can trigger hypothermia, fainting, or even cardiac arrest, depending on the individual&rsquo;s health, body composition, and the water temperature. Experts recommend limiting exposure to 3&ndash;5 minutes for beginners, with gradual adaptation and close monitoring by healthcare professionals.
The video raised concerns not just about the duration but also about whether informed consent was given, if participants were properly briefed, and if adequate emergency measures were in place.
Netizens React: Divided Opinions and Heated Debate
The online reaction has been mixed. While many condemned the company for prioritising spectacle over safety, others voiced support for the founder&rsquo;s defence of mental toughness. Others questioned whether employees could truly opt out of such challenges without fear of judgement or retaliation, especially in closely-knit or high-pressure work environments.
Here&rsquo;s some of the comments. Do note that some comments may not be 100% accurate due to translation:
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/cfe0223b685dbda36cec7c8b80a7586bf877da6f8b8afe2e2d8bd546ab7b9987" />
Corporate Wellness or Cult Mentality?
Team-building activities are typically designed to foster camaraderie, improve communication, and offer a break from routine. But when the line between motivation and manipulation becomes blurred, the risks&mdash;not just physical but psychological&mdash;can outweigh the intended benefits.
Experts say that corporate wellness should focus on inclusivity, emotional safety, and individual boundaries, rather than pushing employees to breaking point under the guise of empowerment.
While some employees may thrive on high-stakes challenges, for others, it may lead to trauma, burnout, or deteriorated trust in leadership.
Lessons Learned: Where Do We Draw the Line?
This controversy serves as a cautionary tale for Malaysian companies&mdash;and corporates around the world&mdash;about the need for careful planning, clear safety measures, and informed consent when introducing wellness or team-building programmes.
HR professionals and company leaders must ask themselves:
<ul>
<li>Is the activity evidence-based and safe?</li>
<li>Is it inclusive and accessible to all employees?</li>
<li>Have medical professionals been properly involved?</li>
<li>Is participation genuinely voluntary?</li>
</ul>
Without these safeguards, the pursuit of resilience and team spirit can result in very real harm&mdash;and potentially legal consequences.
The Aftermath
As of now, the company involved has not issued an apology or confirmed whether any internal review or changes to its wellness programmes are being considered. The female employee who collapsed has not spoken publicly, and her medical condition remains unclear.
The conversation around corporate wellness, employee rights, and viral trends continues online&mdash;reflecting a growing public awareness that while ambition and innovation are welcome in the workplace, employee safety must always come first.
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

Cold plunges can be great—but not for 10 minutes. Know your limits.

ef83410d3e0f9d7becedc185fe35367b92dc47dc74729224b4fccaf3d1945823

Masterclass Or Misstep? Malaysian SME Slammed After Ice Bath Team-Building Ends In Collapse

In a harrowing case that has sent shockwaves across Malaysia, a former MasterChef Malaysia finalist and her ex-husband have each been sentenced to 34 years in prison for the torture and murder of their 28-year-old Indonesian domestic helper. The case, heard at the Kota Kinabalu High Court, exposed disturbing details of prolonged abuse suffered by the victim, whose death came amid the isolation of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Victim Abused in Silence
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/3f31cf9970a7079d26072ba558dff17b6853a36b29c20a054cbad048f4f15992" />
The court found that Etiqah Siti Noorashikeen Mohd Sulong, 37, and her former spouse, Mohammad Ambree Yunos, 44, were jointly responsible for the death of Nur Afiyah Daeng Damin. The crime took place over several days between 8 and 11 December 2021 at their shared residence in Amber Tower, Lido Avenue Condominium, located in Penampang, Sabah.
The prosecution revealed that Nur Afiyah, who had migrated from Indonesia to work as a maid, was subjected to persistent mistreatment and inhumane working conditions. She was not only deprived of wages and basic rights, but also physically tortured over an extended period. Photos and videos presented in court&mdash;recovered from the couple&rsquo;s own mobile phones&mdash;graphically captured the abuse she endured in the days leading up to her death.
Brutality Captured on Camera
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/1bbebfcc1e19e7e0d6a9c2cb8ae7a54ca36309eed41dad0f2d1278eb086088d0" />
According to Deputy Public Prosecutor Dacia Jane Romanus, the abuse was systematic and deliberate. &ldquo;This was not a killing born out of rage or a single moment of violence,&rdquo; she said. &ldquo;It was prolonged, premeditated torture, with no regard for the victim&rsquo;s humanity.&rdquo;
The videos and images showed visible signs of physical injury, with the court hearing that the couple had even documented the abuse themselves, seemingly without remorse. The disturbing nature of the footage strengthened the prosecution&rsquo;s argument that the pair had every intention of inflicting harm and had acted with a shared purpose.
&ldquo;This was a young woman who left her home to earn a living honestly in the midst of a global pandemic,&rdquo; Dacia told the court. &ldquo;She died not in an accident, not in an act of sudden violence, but as a result of sustained, systematic cruelty at the hands of those who were supposed to protect and shelter her.&rdquo;
Court Delivers Verdict and Sentencing
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/62338b84cb95fbcacdaf61013f99d5c70b34ee9c5858cb20e4105167e2ec178a" />
Presiding over the trial, High Court Judge Datuk Dr Lim Hock Leng ruled that the evidence proved beyond reasonable doubt that both Etiqah and Ambree acted with common intention to murder Nur Afiyah. Their failure to provide medical care, food, and fair treatment, paired with overwhelming evidence of injury and abuse, led to their conviction.
The two were charged under Section 302 of the Penal Code, read together with Section 34, which pertains to murder committed by more than one person. This section allows for the death penalty, or imprisonment for not less than 30 years and up to 40 years, as well as not fewer than 12 strokes of the cane for those not sentenced to death.
While the Attorney-General&rsquo;s Chambers initially pushed for the mandatory death sentence, Judge Lim instead imposed 34 years of imprisonment for both individuals, citing the severity of the crime and the strength of the evidence. Ambree was also ordered to receive 12 strokes of the rotan, while Etiqah was exempted from caning due to her gender, in line with Section 289 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Both convicts, who had previously been out on bail, were ordered to begin serving their sentences immediately from the date of conviction.
Defence Fails to Raise Doubt
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/a945c0ac924bed3d43fb0204cfc0e75249bba387f387408552ceb9452d1373d1" /> Etiqah Siti Noorashikeen Mohd Sulang with lawyer Rakhbir Singh at the Court of Appeal in Kota Kinabalu, three years ago. 
In his judgement, Judge Lim noted that the defence had failed to raise any reasonable doubt in the face of overwhelming forensic and photographic evidence. The nature, location, and duration of the victim&rsquo;s injuries were consistent with repeated and intentional infliction of harm, and not an accident or isolated incident.
The court also noted the emotional and psychological torment suffered by the victim, who had been isolated from any form of external support or protection. The judge highlighted how this case reflects not just individual criminality, but also broader systemic vulnerabilities faced by domestic workers&mdash;particularly foreign nationals&mdash;living in private homes in Malaysia.
Prosecution: &ldquo;A Case That Shook the Nation&rdquo;
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/369ba04fa7610d270b306b518eb5d8ea9badaa54457bac23792959f8af3e19f6" />
Calling the crime one of the most distressing cases of recent years, DPP Dacia Jane Romanus urged the court to consider the broader impact on society. &ldquo;The brutality of this case has not only appalled Sabah, but the entire country. It speaks to a failure in how we treat those who come into our homes to serve and support us.&rdquo;
She added that Nur Afiyah was not only denied wages and freedom of movement but was also robbed of dignity and life. &ldquo;She was never allowed to return home. Her body did, but her hopes, her sacrifices, were extinguished behind closed doors,&rdquo; she said.
Public Backlash and Broader Concerns
The case has reignited public outrage over the treatment of domestic workers in Malaysia, particularly those from Indonesia, the Philippines, and Cambodia. NGOs and human rights groups have long campaigned for better safeguards and routine checks, as many workers operate without contracts, proper wages, or protection from abuse.
The fact that Etiqah had once gained public recognition as a finalist in MasterChef Malaysia 2012 made the case all the more shocking, with many questioning how someone in the public eye could inflict such cruelty behind closed doors.
Justice Served&mdash;But Questions Remain
With the sentence now handed down, many hope the conviction marks a turning point in how the legal system handles cases of domestic worker abuse. However, activists caution that without consistent enforcement and policy reforms, many other cases may remain hidden.
Meanwhile, the victim's family in Indonesia is left grappling with a painful loss. No amount of sentencing, they say, can replace the daughter who left to provide for her family and returned in a coffin.
This case stands as a chilling reminder: justice, when delayed or denied, often comes too late for the vulnerable. For Nur Afiyah, the courtroom brought justice after death. For others still living under oppression, it may be the only hope.
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

While Etiqah was exempted from the rotan due to her gender, her ex-husband Ambree was ordered to receive 12 strokes of the cane.

ab913615cee49d2d8512a9f2d0146eb430beb6469209b488b57f97f85918f6f8

MasterChef Malaysia Finalist And Ex-Husband Jailed 34 Years For Maid's Murder

Former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has once again escaped conviction in one of his many legal battles, after the High Court granted him a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) over RM27 million allegedly misappropriated from SRC International. However, the 70-year-old remains behind bars, serving a six-year sentence for a separate SRC-related conviction involving RM42 million.
SRC International: The RM27 Million DNAA Explained
<iframe style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fnajibrazak%2Fposts%2Fpfbid02TiwoRcLMXtckDyrxkJkEpe5Ew9JEmp3sbjNWUzdvx6BnB5bZtxnEdrQanRbX9pbFl&amp;show_text=true&amp;width=500" width="500" height="624" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>&nbsp;
On 20 June 2025, High Court Judge K Muniandy delivered the long-awaited decision on Najib's final SRC-related criminal case, which had stalled since charges were first brought in February 2019. The former premier had been accused of receiving RM27 million in illegal proceeds through his AmPrivate Banking accounts on 8 July 2014.
The judge ruled in favour of a DNAA, agreeing with the defence that it would be unjust for Najib to continue facing charges indefinitely without trial. Noting the prosecution&rsquo;s repeated delays and inability to proceed&mdash;despite six years having passed&mdash;Justice Muniandy said there was no sign the case could move forward within a reasonable time frame.
&ldquo;The prolonged wait has become a long haul for the accused, denying him timely resolution,&rdquo; the judge said. He emphasised that criminal charges should not hang over an accused like &ldquo;the sword of Damocles.&rdquo;
A DNAA means Najib is released from the charges, but not acquitted&mdash;should fresh evidence emerge, the prosecution may reopen the case.
Prosecution&rsquo;s Delays and Missing Documents
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/7ab937d699a838aeb527ed37289ca16e8dde99b05c558748df9bbacbb8648a4e" />
Najib&rsquo;s lead counsel, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, revealed the prosecution had failed to compile over 500 essential documents needed to move forward with trial. When queried by the court in May, the deputy public prosecutor admitted they could not commit to a timeline, leading to further uncertainty.
The judge also noted that no witnesses had been called in the six years since the case was filed, with only repeated postponements. Even the prosecution conceded it would not be prejudiced by a DNAA, highlighting the case&rsquo;s deadlocked state.
Shafee later told reporters that Najib was &ldquo;very happy&rdquo; with the outcome, adding that the number of cases hanging over his client was now diminishing, allowing the former premier to focus solely on the high-profile 1MDB trial.
Najib&rsquo;s Ongoing Legal Woes
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/5379d4145a2d71b8d6443e17be09a74b78ccb33b3adf88755fcad48df6780080" />
While the RM27 million SRC case is now on pause, Najib is far from a free man.
He remains imprisoned in Kajang Prison after being convicted in 2020 for seven charges involving RM42 million from SRC International, including criminal breach of trust, abuse of power, and money laundering. The conviction was upheld by the Court of Appeal in 2021 and the Federal Court in 2022. Initially sentenced to 12 years in prison and fined RM210 million, Najib&rsquo;s sentence was halved in 2024 following a partial royal pardon.
The 1MDB-linked case that landed him in prison was the first to result in an actual conviction&mdash;but it is far from his only legal entanglement.
The Larger 1MDB Scandal and Other DNAA Cases
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/aa4c0c5afbd5c019f4dff8129179d387be9f2f3cda1e4a3522dec3a63c218fd7" />
Najib is currently fighting a separate, more complex case: the 1MDB-Tanore trial. He faces four charges of abuse of power and 21 charges of money laundering involving RM2.27 billion in 1MDB funds. That trial, which began more than seven years ago, is finally nearing its end. Written submissions are due by 30 September 2025, with oral arguments scheduled for October.
He has previously been granted DNAA status in other high-profile cases:
<ul>
<li>RM6.6 Billion IPIC Case: In 2018, Najib and former Treasury secretary-general Tan Sri Irwan Serigar were charged with criminal breach of trust over RM6.6 billion related to a settlement between 1MDB and Abu Dhabi&rsquo;s International Petroleum Investment Company (IPIC). The case stalled due to missing documents and was DNAA&rsquo;d in 2023.</li>
<li>1MDB Audit Report Tampering: Najib and former 1MDB CEO Arul Kanda were acquitted in 2023 of tampering with the 1MDB final audit report after the court found insufficient evidence.</li>
</ul>
House Arrest Bid and Ongoing Controversies
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/99644eb54db6f13278d94eb00d0a370e80ca96ab018fac57d884460d06c75c0a" />
Najib is also pursuing a civil application seeking to serve the remainder of his prison term under house arrest, based on an alleged &ldquo;royal addendum&rdquo; issued in January 2024 by former King Al-Sultan Abdullah. His legal team claims this royal order was overlooked by authorities.
His lawyer Shafee recently lodged a police report against former Attorney General Ahmad Terrirudin Salleh, accusing him of misleading the courts by claiming that the addendum did not exist. Shafee maintains that the former AG had full knowledge of the document, which allegedly permits Najib to complete his sentence under house arrest.
However, access to confirm the existence of the royal decree has reportedly been stalled by the Ministry of Home Affairs. Shafee said the Prisons Department had no objection to Najib lodging a police report himself, but Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail had not granted permission despite multiple written requests.
What Happens Next?
For now, Najib&rsquo;s legal focus shifts solely to the 1MDB-Tanore case. If he is found guilty, it could add more jail time on top of his current sentence&mdash;even with the reduced term from the royal pardon.
The DNAA granted in the RM27 million SRC case spares Najib from immediate further prosecution, but it remains a temporary reprieve. The prosecution is free to reinstate the charges when ready, and the shadow of his extensive legal history still looms large over the former prime minister.
With mounting controversies and his legacy deeply entwined with one of the world's most infamous financial scandals, Najib Razak&rsquo;s courtroom saga is far from over.
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

One case dropped. But the legal battles are far from over.

7c514ff574ab19e688311eab2750c5d22f9efe9b65b62ac02d3ac8f6f2f50b53

Najib Razak Walks Free From RM27 Million SRC Charges – But Remains A Jailed Man

With luxury lifestyles, travel vlogs, and sponsored unboxings dominating social media feeds, it&rsquo;s no wonder that many Malaysian youth are increasingly drawn to the idea of becoming full-time content creators. The appeal of turning hobbies into income&mdash;and the hope of achieving viral success&mdash;has even led some to consider abandoning formal education or traditional career paths.
But behind the glamour lies a far more complex reality. Popular culinary content creator Che Nom, known for her meticulously crafted cooking videos and trusted recipes, has taken to social media to deliver a stark and sobering message for those romanticising the creator lifestyle.
&ldquo;It Looks Fun, But There&rsquo;s More Than Meets the Eye&rdquo; 
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/72c1a49549bc884e9ba8faaf45b15dbaad0400ac6005020be1b112871e52c413" />
In a widely shared <a href="https://www.facebook.com/resepichenom/posts/pfbid02FqcPj8oopnjHuRwSzYLPJdx48SeChuraK7nnPBXcL6QLrj8oKyM4yS8oRH231kTjl">Facebook post</a>, Che Nom opened up about the realities of running a content creation business, especially within the highly competitive culinary niche.
&ldquo;Many DM me saying they love cooking and want to start making food videos because they enjoy watching mine,&rdquo; she wrote. &ldquo;But what people often don&rsquo;t realise is that behind every short video is an enormous amount of effort, planning, and financial cost.&rdquo;
According to Che Nom, passion alone is not enough to survive&mdash;let alone succeed&mdash;in the fast-evolving digital content landscape. From high-quality video production and scripting to sound, lighting, recipe development and editing, each video involves multiple layers of labour and expertise.
Revenue vs. Reality: Why Views Don&rsquo;t Always Pay
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/5f3e2939c597efcaf5ecb824c6db6fc347b2d7182335beed1b49bafb4fdeda1c" />
In what may come as a surprise to many, Che Nom revealed just how little ad revenue can be generated from a seemingly successful video. She pointed to a recent reel on Kek Lapis Sarawak, which received over 56,000 views, yet earned her only RM415.40&mdash;and that, she clarified, was more than a month after it was uploaded.
Even more revealing was the financial breakdown of her monthly production costs, which typically fall between RM12,000 and RM16,000 for just 5 to 6 videos:
<ul>
<li>Videographer: RM2,500&ndash;RM3,500</li>
<li>Editor: RM2,500&ndash;RM3,000</li>
<li>Kitchen assistant: RM2,000&ndash;RM2,500</li>
<li>Premium ingredients &amp; repeated recipe testing</li>
<li>Electric usage for ovens (often for hours)</li>
<li>Utilities, props, equipment, and editing software</li>
</ul>
&ldquo;For those just starting out&mdash;if your monthly views don&rsquo;t even hit 300,000, your ad revenue likely won&rsquo;t exceed RM2,500,&rdquo; she said. &ldquo;That&rsquo;s not enough to cover basic costs, let alone make a living.&rdquo;
Seasoned Creators Are Struggling Too
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/42cf9284992b868217e00e1279e8c8a8164818dccdff52c33a4447120303d447" />
Che Nom didn&rsquo;t only speak from the perspective of a newcomer. She made it clear that even experienced content creators are now facing growing difficulties. As audience habits shift toward shorter formats like TikTok, YouTube viewership is declining for many, particularly on older videos that once generated passive income.
&ldquo;Many long-time creators are struggling now,&rdquo; she explained. &ldquo;RPMs (revenue per thousand views) are dropping, and it&rsquo;s getting harder for new videos to perform well. Passive income from older uploads is dwindling, and viewers have become far more selective.&rdquo;
In this environment, low-quality videos simply won&rsquo;t survive. Poor visuals, unclear audio, or lacklustre storytelling will quickly drive users to swipe away.
Burnout and Budget Pressure: The Emotional Toll
One major misconception Che Nom addressed is the belief that having a team lightens the load. &ldquo;That&rsquo;s only half true,&rdquo; she said. &ldquo;Yes, a team helps with production, but it also adds to monthly costs. If you go solo, you face burnout. If you hire help, you face higher expenses. Either way, it&rsquo;s tough.&rdquo;
The pressure to consistently produce high-performing content&mdash;combined with rising operational costs and unstable ad revenue&mdash;has led many in the industry to feel stretched thin, both financially and emotionally.
The New Rule: Diversify, Don&rsquo;t Depend on Ads
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/2530abe6f858af9771e62d5ec2879a92e99636c01ffa12c2a1651ebaab8d646e" />
One of Che Nom&rsquo;s key messages to aspiring creators was simple but vital: do not rely on YouTube ads alone. Instead, she recommended building multiple revenue streams to support the content business:
<ul>
<li>eBooks: Offering exclusive recipes or guides</li>
<li>Affiliate marketing: Partnering with brands for commission-based promotions</li>
<li>Products: Selling branded merchandise, kitchen tools, or ingredients</li>
<li>Online classes: Hosting paid virtual workshops or tutorials</li>
</ul>
She stressed that creators should only choose monetisation methods that align with their expertise and values, rather than blindly following what&rsquo;s trending.
&ldquo;Find a niche that you&rsquo;re truly good at,&rdquo; she urged. &ldquo;And don&rsquo;t try to compare yourself to someone who&rsquo;s been in the game for a decade.&rdquo;
Final Thoughts: It&rsquo;s Not Just About Glamour&mdash;It&rsquo;s About Grit
Che Nom&rsquo;s message wasn&rsquo;t intended to discourage&mdash;it was meant to ground expectations in reality. She acknowledged the beauty and creative freedom that comes with content creation but reminded her followers that it&rsquo;s also a business that demands planning, resilience, and the willingness to adapt.
&ldquo;Content creation is an art, but the journey is filled with challenges,&rdquo; she concluded. &ldquo;If your passion is genuine, go for it. Just know that success takes more than talent&mdash;it takes strategy, sustainability, and strong mental preparation.&rdquo;
Che Nom&rsquo;s post is a crucial reminder at a time when the dream of going viral seems more accessible than ever. Behind the glossy thumbnails and upbeat vlogs are real people facing real challenges. As she puts it: the dream is worth chasing&mdash;but only with eyes wide open.
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

RM415 profit from 56k views? The truth about content creation might surprise you.

fac3ac4a30f0d778d31008fcb72f0484f3493e1607a88edc62b6e8464ce5ca6f

Che Nom’s Reality Check: The Hidden Costs And Realities Of Being A Content Creator In Malaysia

Despite being mandatory for most Malaysian workers, many contributors to the Social Security Organisation (PERKESO) remain unaware of the full scope of benefits available to them. One such benefit is the Temporary Disablement Benefit (Faedah Hilang Upaya Sementara), which provides income support to workers who are temporarily unable to work due to accidents or injuries &mdash; even during their commute to or from the office.
A recent <a href="https://www.threads.com/@mikaylamajla/post/DK_G2VMSE97?xmt=AQF0E7z_Y0P-jZH1LGO6g_zDGOnxC3HNyQJYzS1CEXQjgA">viral post</a> by a Malaysian woman has highlighted just how effective and swift the claims process can be &mdash; if you know what steps to take.
A Freak Accident on the Way to Work
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/4484df2bb9346e31e25e233bc62e2ee66411ef4130d7c73bb620e400d0fa9baf" />
The woman, a single mother, shared her experience on Threads, playfully beginning her post with: &ldquo;Who doesn&rsquo;t want free money??&rdquo; She went on to explain that she had fractured her foot after slipping into a roadside drain while dropping off her child at school &mdash; part of her usual journey to work.
&ldquo;It was kinda funny at first, but the pain was like death! I couldn&rsquo;t even stand,&rdquo; she wrote. Parents nearby helped carry her to the car, and her fianc&eacute; rushed her to a nearby clinic. The injury was so severe that a specialist later confirmed it required immediate surgery the very next day. Her X-ray showed seven fractures in her foot, including an avulsed peroneal tendon &mdash; a serious and painful injury.
Two Months of Recovery &ndash; And a PERKESO Lifeline
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/fc4addafaf4db47dc1f1b08d72de2a2c2197f7bedb792f33387b7fdd41129f32" />
She was placed on two months&rsquo; medical leave and had to use a wheelchair and crutches during her recovery. Knowing she contributed to PERKESO via salary deductions, she investigated whether she qualified for the Temporary Disablement Benefit &mdash; and found that she did.
Crucially, PERKESO confirmed her eligibility despite the accident occurring while dropping her child at school and not yet being at her workplace. As it was part of her regular route to work, it counted as a valid commuting injury under PERKESO guidelines.
PERKESO then contacted her to verify her story. When asked why she didn&rsquo;t use public transport, she explained that as a single mother living in Bukit Damansara, owning a car was a necessity due to poor public transport access in her area.
Her claim was approved just four days after submitting the required documents.
Quick and Efficient Processing
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/490d416ad076a1824f7aa6affa0be418d57ede352dd05e22cf6bcbd7b8b728ac" />
She submitted her application at the PERKESO Jalan Tun Razak branch. Within five minutes, her number was called. The entire submission process took under 10 minutes.
The next day, she received a phone call for follow-up. By 13 June, the funds were deposited into her account. Her experience was so smooth that she praised PERKESO for their efficiency and even encouraged others to make use of their entitlements.
&ldquo;Thank you, PERKESO, for making things easier for this single mum,&rdquo; she said emotionally.
What Is Temporary Disablement Benefit?
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/cddd2d8def74a52c392aaa1a3fb2cd82804758d0d51fe66da7015ffef8f0d80d" />
According to PERKESO&rsquo;s official site, the Temporary Disablement Benefit (HUS) provides daily income support of 80% of your average assumed daily wage. The payout ranges from a minimum of RM30 to a maximum of RM158.67 per day. You must receive medical leave of at least four days (including the day of the accident) to be eligible.
This benefit is part of PERKESO&rsquo;s broader Employment Injury Scheme, which also includes:
<ul>
<li>Medical Benefits</li>
<li>Permanent Disablement Benefit</li>
<li>Constant Attendance Allowance</li>
<li>Vocational and Physical Rehabilitation</li>
<li>Dependents&rsquo; Benefit</li>
<li>Funeral Management Allowance</li>
<li>Education Benefits for Children</li>
</ul>
Additionally, PERKESO also administers the Invalidity Scheme, which provides 24-hour protection in cases of illness or disability not related to work. It includes benefits such as:
<ul>
<li>Invalidity Pension</li>
<li>Invalidity Grant</li>
<li>Constant Attendance Allowance</li>
<li>Survivor&rsquo;s Pension</li>
<li>Rehabilitation Facilities</li>
<li>Dialysis, Return-To-Work Support</li>
<li>Funeral and Education Benefits</li>
</ul>
There is also the Employment Insurance System (SIP), which offers financial assistance to those who have lost their jobs under qualifying conditions.
How to Make a Claim: Required Documents
To ensure your claim goes smoothly, make sure you prepare and submit the following documents:
<ol>
<li>Form 34 (downloadable from the PERKESO website)</li>
<li>Copy of your NRIC</li>
<li>Original medical certificate (MC) &mdash; keep a second copy for yourself</li>
<li>Payslips from the six months prior to the accident</li>
<li>Attendance record for the month of the accident</li>
<li>Bank statement from a local bank</li>
<li>Police report lodged at a station near where the accident occurred</li>
<li>Hand-drawn route map from home to your workplace showing your travel path</li>
</ol>
You&rsquo;ll also need to get your HR department to sign and stamp Form 34 before submission.
She chose to walk in rather than submit her documents online, explaining that doing so allowed her to confirm everything was in order on the spot &mdash; and get a receipt as proof of submission.
Submit Within 3 Months &ndash; Or Risk Rejection
Importantly, she reminded others that all claims must be submitted within three months of the incident. Claims made after that period will not be entertained, regardless of the reason.
Don&rsquo;t Overlook Your Rights
She concluded her post with a simple message: &ldquo;This is your right. PERKESO is here to protect us workers. Just follow the steps and prepare your docs properly.&rdquo;
Whether you&rsquo;re injured at work, on your way there, or returning home &mdash; you may be entitled to benefits you never even knew existed.
For more information, visit the <a href="https://www.perkeso.gov.my">official PERKESO website</a>.
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

Unaware of PERKESO’s support? It’s time to know what you're entitled to.

82458a0bee3dc16f00a262d7f9161a5ba04d9504cecc98fece3604cdedaa43da

Know Your Rights: How A Single Mum's PERKESO Claim Was Approved In Just Four Days

From 1 July 2025, Malaysia will implement a sweeping expansion of the Sales and Service Tax (SST), as part of the government&rsquo;s broader MADANI economic reform agenda. The overhaul, announced in Budget 2025 and detailed by Finance Minister II Datuk Seri Amir Hamzah Azizan, is aimed at enhancing national revenue, reducing fiscal deficits, and improving public services without placing excessive pressure on ordinary Malaysians.
The Ministry of Finance has said the move is designed to strengthen the country's fiscal position, broaden the tax base, and upgrade infrastructure and the social safety net. While some consumers are bracing for price hikes, analysts believe the impact will vary across sectors.
What&rsquo;s Staying Tax-Free (No changes)? 
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/79c27172b858d662193a9988c6ecc237fd3a3d68503dada61bd91b6c3822cc90" />
The good news for Malaysian households is that core staples and daily necessities remain zero-rated. This includes:
<ul>
<li>Unprocessed food: chicken, beef, fish, prawns, squid</li>
<li>Local produce: fruits and vegetables</li>
<li>Staples: rice, sugar, cooking oil, flour, pasta, noodles, milk</li>
<li>Essential goods: medicines, pet food, books, newspapers, journals</li>
<li>Construction inputs: cement, sand, stones</li>
<li>Agricultural supplies: fertilisers, pesticides, farming equipment</li>
<li>Medical devices and livestock feed</li>
</ul>
These items are protected to maintain affordability and protect vulnerable groups.
5% Sales Tax: Luxury Food and Industrial Goods 
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/2e9c195f5592d1198fb0fd40b05932be0c611242fda41a0db738983bc3bb6c93" />
A moderate 5% sales tax will now apply to a selection of luxury or imported products, reflecting their non-essential nature. Among the revised or newly taxed items in this tier:
<ul>
<li>King crab, salmon, cod</li>
<li>Truffles and imported strawberries</li>
<li>Essential oils and silk fabrics</li>
<li>Industrial machinery</li>
</ul>
Items already in the 5% bracket and unchanged include abalone, lobster, quinoa, cheese, fruit jams, and smartphones.
10% Sales Tax: High-End Goods and Collectibles 
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/834ff1c3e41f102895c36e3d47a35916f461b7a92500f9d4a9c1dfd840c52eca" />
The 10% bracket targets premium and luxury categories. Revised items include:
<ul>
<li>Racing bicycles</li>
<li>Antique and hand-painted artworks</li>
<li>Tungsten scrap waste</li>
</ul>
Caviar, shark fins, alcoholic beverages, cigarettes, cigars, and leather products remain taxed at 10%.
Expanded Service Tax: What&rsquo;s Affected?
The service tax, previously limited in scope, has now been extended to six new categories, with rates of 6% or 8%, depending on the sector. Notably, the government has built in exemptions and grace periods to ease the transition, particularly for small businesses and ongoing contracts.
<ol>
<li> Construction Services (6%) </li>
</ol>
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/0781a862147735e98fb447d6211da1bc8b7a1f673a53f9f0dc23fc48eafc91d4" />
Tax applies to construction work on infrastructure, commercial, and industrial buildings exceeding RM1.5 million in annual revenue. However, residential projects and public housing are exempt. Business-to-business (B2B) services and contracts signed before July 1 will enjoy a 12-month exemption.
<ol start="2">
<li> Financial Services (8%) </li>
</ol>
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/7aad389470a344b4921fa173860faa58ff29bdb0d8e454bdaa0b7d6773238e26" />
Fee-based or commission-driven services, such as loan processing, will be taxed. However, exemptions include:
<ul>
<li>Basic banking and Islamic financing</li>
<li>Capital markets and foreign exchange gains</li>
<li>Outward remittances</li>
<li>Shariah-compliant structures</li>
<li>Services by Bursa Malaysia and Labuan-based institutions</li>
</ul>
<ol start="3">
<li> Private Healthcare (6%) </li>
</ol>
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/9d04d8a67d8283b10c78d09ae54444a042cdda7dc68f6bb707e40a0187ab412a" />
Applies only to non-Malaysians. Malaysian citizens are fully exempt, including for traditional and complementary treatments such as Malay, Chinese, Indian, Islamic medicine, chiropractic care, and physiotherapy.
<ol start="4">
<li> Private Education (6%) </li>
</ol>
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/5d6bbac4f3294df37ac6cea5eda7139c3ce24131e9f8302fd3ac1e2fa641d494" />
Only affects:
<ul>
<li>Private preschools, primary, and secondary schools charging over RM60,000 annually per student</li>
<li>Higher education institutions for international students</li>
</ul>
Malaysians and persons with disabilities are exempt.
<ol start="5">
<li> Beauty Services (8%) </li>
</ol>
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/4a6975b08f4460e98298a32f97b71f1fb05daf98a80973dda3990dd6d3dede35" />
Includes facials, hairdressing, tattoos, body slimming, and similar services provided by businesses earning over RM500,000 annually.
<ol start="6">
<li> Rental and Leasing (8%) </li>
</ol>
Imposed on companies with revenue over RM500,000 per year from leasing or rental services. Exemptions include:
<ul>
<li>Residential property rentals</li>
<li>Reading materials</li>
<li>Financial leases</li>
<li>Tangible assets located overseas</li>
<li>MSMEs and B2B transactions</li>
<li>Existing contracts (12-month grace period)</li>
</ul>
Business and Market Response
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/3a14e8e0b78dbd1517971a48fe904e1bcff718e67cf3105ab5326ae833557064" />
Despite consumer concerns over potential price hikes, analysts from CIMB Securities and Hong Leong Investment Bank have suggested the expanded SST will have a limited impact on inflation and broader economic performance.
CIMB warned of potential margin pressure for consumer-facing businesses, especially those selling discretionary or luxury goods, as companies may absorb part of the cost increases to maintain affordability. Conversely, essential goods manufacturers and retailers are expected to weather the changes better, buoyed by consistent demand.
HLIB, meanwhile, maintains that sectors such as construction, banking, and healthcare are largely insulated due to cost pass-through capabilities and strong regional competitiveness.
The Finance Ministry projects inflation to remain within a manageable range of 2.0% to 3.5%, thanks to the targeted nature of the revised tax framework.
A Grace Period for Compliance
To ease the transition, the government has announced a non-punitive grace period until the end of 2025, during which no enforcement action will be taken against businesses making a genuine effort to comply.
Further clarity is expected in the coming weeks, as the Finance Ministry and Royal Malaysian Customs Department will issue detailed guidelines, regulations, and FAQs to help businesses and consumers navigate the updated SST regime.
While Malaysians brace for the SST expansion, it is clear the government has opted for a targeted, strategic approach &mdash; exempting essentials while taxing luxury goods and services more likely consumed by higher-income groups. Businesses will need to adapt quickly, but with transitional support and careful policy design, the impact on everyday Malaysians may be less severe than feared.
What are your thoughts on this? Let us know in the comments. 
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

From beauty salons to imported fruit, the revised tax regime reshapes daily spending — but essentials remain untouched.

Singapore Chinatown Restaurant Denies Viral 104% 'American Tax' Sign As Malicious Prank

When a controversial surcharge notice goes viral.

Latest News

Malaysia’s Electricity Tariff Restructuring 2025: What You Need To Know

Apple Sued Over Crypto Scam: Woman Loses $80,000 After Downloading Fraudulent App From App Store

Masterclass Or Misstep? Malaysian SME Slammed After Ice Bath Team-Building Ends In Collapse

MasterChef Malaysia Finalist And Ex-Husband Jailed 34 Years For Maid's Murder

Najib Razak Walks Free From RM27 Million SRC Charges – But Remains A Jailed Man

Related Articles

Malaysia’s Electricity Tariff Restructuring 2025: What You Need To Know

Apple Sued Over Crypto Scam: Woman Loses $80,000 After Downloading Fraudulent App From App Store

Che Nom’s Reality Check: The Hidden Costs And Realities Of Being A Content Creator In Malaysia

Know Your Rights: How A Single Mum's PERKESO Claim Was Approved In Just Four Days

Malaysia’s Expanded SST Kicks In This July: What You Need to Know

Related Articles

Malaysia’s Electricity Tariff Restructuring 2025: What You Need To Know

Apple Sued Over Crypto Scam: Woman Loses $80,000 After Downloading Fraudulent App From App Store

Che Nom’s Reality Check: The Hidden Costs And Realities Of Being A Content Creator In Malaysia

Know Your Rights: How A Single Mum's PERKESO Claim Was Approved In Just Four Days

Malaysia’s Expanded SST Kicks In This July: What You Need to Know